Multiculturalism: the Nihilistic Trojan Horse

ni⋅hil⋅ism [nahy-uh-liz-uhm, nee-] –noun 1. total rejection of established laws and institutions.
2. anarchy, terrorism, or other revolutionary activity.
3. total and absolute destructiveness, esp. toward the world at large and including oneself: the power-mad nihilism that marked Hitler’s last years.
4. Philosophy. a. an extreme form of skepticism: the denial of all real existence or the possibility of an objective basis for truth.
b. nothingness or nonexistence.
(from: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nihilism)

“We love death. The US loves life. That is the difference between us two.” Osama Bin Laden

Multiculturalism is the lie that all cultures are equal. Or maybe some believe they just should be treated equally. Regardless, to embrace the lie that cultures that celebrate death are equal to cultures that celebrate life is to reject objective truth. The folly of this is that no matter how irrational a culture might be, very few if any people from a non-western culture would offer the same deference. To believe in multiculuralism literally is to reject any notion of good and evil or right and wrong, because nearly everything that anyone regards as immoral or wrong is permissable in one culture or another. Check out my blog on the Kombai tribe for a few examples: http://totallyobliviousguy.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/cultural-confusion. So, logically speaking (I understand it’s asking a lot for most people who try to push multiculturalism to think logically) multiculturalism is nihilism. It is not merely nihilistic, it is nihilism at its very core.
Now come the concessions. Yes, there is some value in cultural customs from across the world, and we can learn things from other cultures. But there are objective concepts such as right and wrong, good and evil. And the cultures that identify and emphasize those are the most productive and advanced for a reason. To reject the moral superiority of western cultures (though they are far from perfect) is to reject civilization and modernity as we know it. Finally, we must separate the individuals from their culture. To say that one civilization’s culture is better than another’s is not to degrade the individuals in an inferior culture, nor does it somehow make them less human. But this should be self evident. To

The Truth About the Environmentalist Movement

Now, in video! A great video that really gets to the heart of the environmentalist movement. It really is all about the triumph of emotion over logic.

Climate Chains from Climate Chains on Vimeo.

Misanthropy and Environmentalism

“The environmental movement I helped found has lost its objectivity, morality and humanity. The pain and suffering it is inflicting on families in developing countries must no longer be tolerated.” Patrick Moore, Greenpeace co-founder

The reason I am so violently anti-environmentalist is because I believe at the heart of it, environmentalism is destructive, misanthropic, and Godless. I can scarcely think of one redeeming quality of environmentalism. Yes, I’m all for national parks and the like and keeping the environment clean. But this is not what the modern environmental movement is about today. I am all for sensible conservation. I am against starving people to death because some people want to feel good about “sustainable farming” and “organic” food. (http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/9/26/185816.shtml and http://sitemaker.umich.edu/sec006group5/africa) I don’t think that people are a cancer on the earth (http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/e-sermons/humcan.html) nor do I believe that there is an “optimum population” for the earth. (http://www.optimumpopulation.org/opt.earth.html) I don’t think millions of people should have died in Africa because of the DDT ban. (one of  the greatest tragedy of the 20th century, largely unreported) http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/summ02/DDT.html I don’t like mysticism, neopaganism or other superstitious pseudo-faiths. And yet slowly but surely these fringe ideas are slipping into the mainstream. http://stanford.wellsphere.com/bioethics-article/deep-ecology-misanthropy-moving-into-mainstream-environmentalism/631701 There just isn’t good science to support any of the green movement’s ideas and claims about nearly everything. We aren’t destroying the earth, at least not in the USA. The US is substantially cleaner than even 40 years ago. And I would discourage any God fearing person from believing that He would allow us to destroy it. The bottom line is this simple: environmentalism opposes the health and growth of the human race by prioritizing the “health of the planet” above the personal choices, quality of living, reproductive choice (i.e. the choice to have as many children as you want) and health of its human inhabitants. It quite literally seeks to destroy human life because human life is a cancer that is destroying all other life. This alone should make the green movement absolutely intolerable and should cause any rational person to oppose it. But the kicker is that none of it is true. Even if you believed the survival of the earth were more important than the survival of the human race, the environmental movement (for the most part) gets it wrong. Because mankind isn’t a cancer, and we aren’t destroying the environment. I don’t know if you’ve seen the Planet Earth documentary, but I dare anyone to watch that and explain how humans are destroying the earth.